Hello,
I wont blog here anymore, you can follow up my new blogs on
http://blogs.technet.com/b/nawar/
Friday, May 28, 2010
Monday, May 03, 2010
HUB Routing in a DAG Scenario
Nice one :)
When the Hub Transport server is co-located with a Mailbox server that's a member of a DAG, there are changes in routing behavior to ensure that the resiliency features in both server roles will provide the necessary protection for messages sent to and received by users on that server. The Hub Transport server role was modified so that it now attempts to reroute a message for a local Mailbox server to another Hub Transport server in the same site if the Hub Transport server is also a DAG member and it has a copy of the mailbox database mounted locally. This extra hop was added to put the message in the transport dumpster on a different Hub Transport server.
For example, EX1 hosts the Hub Transport server role and Mailbox server role and is a member of a DAG. When a message arrives in transport for EX1 destined for a recipient whose mailbox is also on EX1, transport will reroute the message to another Hub Transport server in the site (for example, EX2), and that server will deliver the message to the mailbox on EX1.
There's a second, similar behavior change related to the Microsoft Exchange Mail Submission service. This service was modified so that it would not submit messages to a local Hub Transport server role when the Mailbox server or Hub Transport server is a member of a DAG. In this scenario, the behavior of transport is to load balance submission requests across other Hub Transport servers in the same Active Directory site, and fall back to a local Hub Transport server if there are no other available Hub Transport servers in the same site.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638137.aspx#CT
When the Hub Transport server is co-located with a Mailbox server that's a member of a DAG, there are changes in routing behavior to ensure that the resiliency features in both server roles will provide the necessary protection for messages sent to and received by users on that server. The Hub Transport server role was modified so that it now attempts to reroute a message for a local Mailbox server to another Hub Transport server in the same site if the Hub Transport server is also a DAG member and it has a copy of the mailbox database mounted locally. This extra hop was added to put the message in the transport dumpster on a different Hub Transport server.
For example, EX1 hosts the Hub Transport server role and Mailbox server role and is a member of a DAG. When a message arrives in transport for EX1 destined for a recipient whose mailbox is also on EX1, transport will reroute the message to another Hub Transport server in the site (for example, EX2), and that server will deliver the message to the mailbox on EX1.
There's a second, similar behavior change related to the Microsoft Exchange Mail Submission service. This service was modified so that it would not submit messages to a local Hub Transport server role when the Mailbox server or Hub Transport server is a member of a DAG. In this scenario, the behavior of transport is to load balance submission requests across other Hub Transport servers in the same Active Directory site, and fall back to a local Hub Transport server if there are no other available Hub Transport servers in the same site.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638137.aspx#CT
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
CAS Static ports and what to LB
from http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/planning-architecture/uncovering-new-rpc-client-access-service-exchange-2010-part2.html
On the CAS servers, for Mailbox connections, you need to use add a DWORD registry key named “TCP/IP Port” under: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeRpc\ParametersSystem
Set the value to the port number to be assigned. In this article we use port 55000, but you are free to choose whatever port you want to use, just remember it should not conflict with other applications using the port. It is recommend you choose a port within the dynamic RPC ranger (1024-65535).
To use a static port for public folder access, you need to do the same on the mailbox servers:
First open the registry editor. Then add a DWORD key named “TCP/IP Port” under: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeRPC\ParametersSystem
It’s fine to use the same port that you specified on the CAS server
Finally you need to limit the port usage for clients that connect to the NSPI endpoint for directory access. Unlike MAPI access to mailboxes and public folders this is done by modifying a file more specifically the Microsoft.exchange.addressbook.service.exe.config configuration file located in the Exchange Bin folder
Open the file in Notepad and then change the “RpcTcpPort” value from the default assignment of “0” to the port you want Outlook clients and Exchange to use for the directory access via the NSPI EndPoint. In this article we use port 55001.
When you have done the above changes, you should reboot the Mailbox and Client Access on which you performed the above changes.
from the installation guides:
The values used in NLB must be the same across all nodes in the NLB cluster. The values specified here will ensure that the Windows Network Load Balancing array can load-balance HTTPS (TCP443), IMAP4 (TCP143 and TCP993), POP3 (TCP110 and TCP995), RPC Endpoint Mapper (TCP135), Address Book service (TCP55000), and RPC Client Access (TCP55001).
On the CAS servers, for Mailbox connections, you need to use add a DWORD registry key named “TCP/IP Port” under: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeRpc\ParametersSystem
Set the value to the port number to be assigned. In this article we use port 55000, but you are free to choose whatever port you want to use, just remember it should not conflict with other applications using the port. It is recommend you choose a port within the dynamic RPC ranger (1024-65535).
To use a static port for public folder access, you need to do the same on the mailbox servers:
First open the registry editor. Then add a DWORD key named “TCP/IP Port” under: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeRPC\ParametersSystem
It’s fine to use the same port that you specified on the CAS server
Finally you need to limit the port usage for clients that connect to the NSPI endpoint for directory access. Unlike MAPI access to mailboxes and public folders this is done by modifying a file more specifically the Microsoft.exchange.addressbook.service.exe.config configuration file located in the Exchange Bin folder
Open the file in Notepad and then change the “RpcTcpPort” value from the default assignment of “0” to the port you want Outlook clients and Exchange to use for the directory access via the NSPI EndPoint. In this article we use port 55001.
When you have done the above changes, you should reboot the Mailbox and Client Access on which you performed the above changes.
from the installation guides:
The values used in NLB must be the same across all nodes in the NLB cluster. The values specified here will ensure that the Windows Network Load Balancing array can load-balance HTTPS (TCP443), IMAP4 (TCP143 and TCP993), POP3 (TCP110 and TCP995), RPC Endpoint Mapper (TCP135), Address Book service (TCP55000), and RPC Client Access (TCP55001).
Monday, April 19, 2010
"Warning: Failed to cleanup the source mailbox after the move"
In Exchange 2010 when a source mailbox is moved from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 using the Mailbox Replication Service there is a potential issue can arise that source mailbox is not removed at the end of the move.
All of the content in the mailbox is moved from the source Exchange 2003 mailbox to the Exchange 2010 destination mailbox. All the user mailbox attributes are updated to point to the new Exchange 2010 mailbox
This issue can be caused by problems within the search folders that are located in the source mailbox
This issue will be mainly encountered in Exchange 2003 servers. This issue currently resolved in the Exchange 2007 mailbox servers that have been upgraded to Service Pack 2.
When you try to purge the mailboxes you will get the following error:
"The Operation cannot be performed because this mailbox was already reconnected to an existing user"
The solution is : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;930363
All of the content in the mailbox is moved from the source Exchange 2003 mailbox to the Exchange 2010 destination mailbox. All the user mailbox attributes are updated to point to the new Exchange 2010 mailbox
This issue can be caused by problems within the search folders that are located in the source mailbox
This issue will be mainly encountered in Exchange 2003 servers. This issue currently resolved in the Exchange 2007 mailbox servers that have been upgraded to Service Pack 2.
When you try to purge the mailboxes you will get the following error:
"The Operation cannot be performed because this mailbox was already reconnected to an existing user"
The solution is : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;930363
Thursday, April 15, 2010
DAG witness on non exchange server
If the witness server you specify isn't an Exchange 2010 server, you must add the "Exchange Trusted Subsystem" universal security group to the "local Administrators" group on the witness server. These security permissions are necessary to ensure that Exchange can create a directory and share on the witness server as needed. If the proper permissions aren't configured, the following error is returned:
Error: An error occurred during discovery of the database availability group topology. Error: An error occurred while attempting a cluster operation. Error: Cluster API "AddClusterNode() (MaxPercentage=12) failed with 0x80070005. Error: Access is denied."
Error: An error occurred during discovery of the database availability group topology. Error: An error occurred while attempting a cluster operation. Error: Cluster API "AddClusterNode() (MaxPercentage=12) failed with 0x80070005. Error: Access is denied."
Wednesday, April 07, 2010
What happened to –ConfigurationOnly?
In many of the disaster recovery scenarios in Exchange 2007, one of the most useful cmdlets is the “Move-mailbox” with the “ConfigurationOnly” parameter.
With the “ConfigurationOnly” parameter the mailbox content is not physically moved but instead mailbox configurations gets changed “mailbox location”, for example we could direct the mailbox(s) to a functioning server and create a dialtone database or if we have a database with clean shutdown state (from a failed server or backup) we could mount this database on a different functioning server and redirect users to that database (Database Portability) .
In Exchange Server 2010 the “Move-Mailbox” cmdlet is now replaced with the “New-MoveRequest” cmdlet and the “ConfigurationOnly” parameter is no longer available.
So in Exchange 2010 to maintain this powerful functionality and to allow a configuration only move of mailboxes, we will be using the “Set-Mailbox” cmdlet with the “Database” parameter, for example to move all the users whose mailboxes is on database DB1 to DB5 we will use:
Get-Mailbox -Database DB1 | Set-Mailbox –Database DB5
The example above shows how powerful the Set-Mailbox cmdlet in Exchange 2010 and care should be taken when working with this cmdlet.
With the “ConfigurationOnly” parameter the mailbox content is not physically moved but instead mailbox configurations gets changed “mailbox location”, for example we could direct the mailbox(s) to a functioning server and create a dialtone database or if we have a database with clean shutdown state (from a failed server or backup) we could mount this database on a different functioning server and redirect users to that database (Database Portability) .
In Exchange Server 2010 the “Move-Mailbox” cmdlet is now replaced with the “New-MoveRequest” cmdlet and the “ConfigurationOnly” parameter is no longer available.
So in Exchange 2010 to maintain this powerful functionality and to allow a configuration only move of mailboxes, we will be using the “Set-Mailbox” cmdlet with the “Database” parameter, for example to move all the users whose mailboxes is on database DB1 to DB5 we will use:
Get-Mailbox -Database DB1 | Set-Mailbox –Database DB5
The example above shows how powerful the Set-Mailbox cmdlet in Exchange 2010 and care should be taken when working with this cmdlet.
Thursday, April 01, 2010
Update Rollup 3 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 2
Update Rollup 3 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 2 (SP2) resolves issues that were found in Exchange Server 2007 SP2 since the software was released. This update rollup is highly recommended for all Exchange Server 2007 SP2 customers.
For a list of changes that are included in this update rollup, see KB979784.
This update rollup does not apply to Exchange Server 2007 Release To Manufacturing (RTM) or Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 1 (SP1). For a list of update rollups applicable to Exchange Server 2007 RTM or Exchange Server 2007 SP1, refer to the Knowledge Base article KB937052.
This is a cumulative update rollup and replaces the following:
KB971534 Update Rollup 1 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 2 (KB971534)
KB972076 Update Rollup 2 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 2 (KB972076)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=c781326a-7b81-444d-9836-760fa1e3a28a&displaylang=en
For a list of changes that are included in this update rollup, see KB979784.
This update rollup does not apply to Exchange Server 2007 Release To Manufacturing (RTM) or Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 1 (SP1). For a list of update rollups applicable to Exchange Server 2007 RTM or Exchange Server 2007 SP1, refer to the Knowledge Base article KB937052.
This is a cumulative update rollup and replaces the following:
KB971534 Update Rollup 1 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 2 (KB971534)
KB972076 Update Rollup 2 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 2 (KB972076)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=c781326a-7b81-444d-9836-760fa1e3a28a&displaylang=en
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
versions versions versions !
Run on PS: GCM exsetup | %{$_.Fileversioninfo}
then follow
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/158530
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232170(EXCHG.80).aspx
then follow
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/158530
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232170(EXCHG.80).aspx
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Outlook 2003: E-mail messages take a long time to send and receive when you use an Exchange 2010 mailbox
This problem occurs because Exchange Server 2010 does not issue UDP notifications to Outlook 2003. Therefore, Outlook 2003 cannot register to receive UDP notifications from Exchange Server 2010. Additionally, Outlook 2003 is not notified about changes that are made to a folder until Outlook 2003 polls the server for these changes. The default polling interval for Outlook 2003 is about 60 seconds. This is why you see delays that last approximately 1 minute in these folder actions
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;2009942
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;2009942
Friday, March 05, 2010
Latest Exchnage Updates
Exchange 2010: Release Date: February 18, 2010 Update Rollup 2 for Exchange Server 2010 resolves issues that were found in Exchange Server 2010 since the software was released. This update rollup is highly recommended for all Exchange Server 2010 customers. For a list of changes that are included in this update rollup, see KB979611. This is a cumulative update rollup and replaces the following: KB976573 Update Rollup 1 for Exchange Server 2010 (KB976573) | Exchange 2007: Release Date: January 21, 2010 For a list of changes that are included in this update rollup, see KB972076. This update rollup does not apply to Exchange Server 2007 Release To Manufacturing (RTM) or Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 1 (SP1). For a list of update rollups applicable to Exchange Server 2007 RTM or Exchange Server 2007 SP1, refer to the Knowledge Base article KB937052. This is a cumulative update rollup and replaces the following: KB971534 Update Rollup 1 for Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 2 (KB971534 |
Helpful Notes: · For detailed steps about how to install update rollups on a clustered mailbox server in Exchange 2007, see the following: · For detailed steps about how to install update rollups on Exchange 2010 on DAG server, see the following: | |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
